I just returned from a vacation to Florida, driving both ways. As we drove through cities, particularly Washington and New York, I reflected on the presence of expanded lanes and dedicated commuter lanes. Knowing what we know now, these solutions to commuter traffic are inferior to developing better public transportation. I would suggest further that we always have known, or should have known, to give more credence to public transportation. Our problem has not been with knowledge but with attitude.
In either case, expanded highway lanes or public transportation, government is necessary to implement and maintain the solution. In the case of expanded highway lanes and commuter lanes the purpose of the solution is to indulge individual lifestyles. I use the word indulgence intentionally because, once again, government must provide this indulgence. The individual cannot decide: “I’m sick and tired of this commuter traffic so I’m building myself an additional commuter lane.” Without government the individual lifestyle preference for driving one’s car and not be stuck in commuter traffic cannot be fulfilled.
In the case of public transportation the purpose of the solution is to become more independent. Wait a second! How can an individual be more independent if they depend on public transportation? The individual depends on government for most transportation, public or otherwise. Whether driving in a metro bus or a commuter land the same refrain of “there but for the grace of government” still applies. Yet with public transportation there is less social dependence created for fossil fuels, and less individual dependence created for owning and maintaining an automobile.
So the choice really comes down to whether government should facilitate indulgent lifestyles or independent lifestyles. We have been convinced by corporate media and even some noted academics that the indulgences of consumerism is the essence of liberty, but don’t be fooled. We have been herded in our dependence on fossil fuels and automobiles, herded by government and herded by corporations, with grave consequences. When a soldier dies in Iraq, he dies not for the sake of real freedom or independence, but for indulgence.
The irony of commenting on public transportation after driving to Florida and back is not lost on me. In truth, I do not know the fuel comparison for individuals driving to Florida versus taking a plane or bus. I do know that driving in my 43 mpg Toyota Echo saves money over flying and renting a car in Florida. I know that commuting with a car does not similarly save money over public transportation when all the expenses of commuting are factored in. I know that following the path of public transportation might lead to the next logical step of solar panels or some other renewable energy solution being installed along the public transportation lanes. I know that in all these cases what government does affects the choices we make.
Tags: Independence
